Do these news outlets appear to rely on different types of sources? Of the two outlets, does one favor official or expert sources over the other? Does one outlet favor hearsay or opinion? Are the sources credible? How can you tell? Does the writing or presentation style differ between the two outlets? Do they present an objective point of view? For stories that appear objective, describe what gives them the appearance of objectivity. For stories that seem non-objective, describe what indicates a lack of objectivity. What are the main differences in the way the two outlets present the story? Do they differ in their emphasis of how the story affects certain groups of people? Do they use different words or phrases that indicate different attitudes towards the subject? (For example, one source might refer to a group as terrorists while the other calls that group insurgents orrebels.) Does one source present the story as more important to their news agenda than the other does? If so, how is that conveyed? What other factors account for the differences between the stories from these two news outlets? If you were to rewrite this story and had access to the resources to do so, what sources would you want to use? Why? Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines
Previous answers to this question
This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.
Get The Answer