Business Maryland Vs King. The “Critical Legal Thinking Case Writing Assignment” shall take the following form and include the following elements:

The “Critical Legal Thinking Case Writing Assignment” shall take the following form and include the following elements:

1. Case name.

2. Answers to the question(s) accompanying the “Critical Legal Thinking Case” in the textbook.

3. Legal reasons supporting your answer(s).

4. Your opinion of whether the outcome in the case based upon your determination is good or bad and how you would have decided the case if you were the judge.

5. Reasoning supporting your opinion of the outcome of the case and your preferred outcome.

6. Internet Research supporting your assignment.

PLEASE NOTE THAT ITEMS 1, 3, 4, 5, AND 6 OF THE ASSIGNMENT ARE REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE ANSWER OF THE QUESTION(S) IN THE BOOK.

Analysis of cases and issues shall be assisted by Internet research. All Internet research shall be cited by web address, name of article, and author, if authorship is stated. A complete copy of the Internet article cited may be attached to the written report or a web address hyperlink to the Internet article may be included in your Assignment. Internet research may be the complete case itself (those cases in the book are usually summarized and not complete). Internet research may be someone’s analysis of the case. Internet research may be a general discussion of the issues and legal principles involved in the case or similar types of cases. Internet research may be a general discussion of the area of law involved in the case. Often, good sources of Internet research are the web sites listed in the textbook in the Chapter in which your “Critical Legal Thinking Case” is located. Although everyone should be able to find some internet research supporting their assignment, if you are unable to do so, at the very least, state in your paper that you were unable to find Internet research, and list a web site address that you searched without finding anything, so that I will know that you made some effort to find some Internet support. Analysis of cases may also be supported by traditional library sources, properly attributed to sources.

Example Writing assignment

1. 6.1 Assumption of Risk–Lilya v. The Greater Gulf State Fair, Inc.

2. Was riding the mechanical bull an open and obvious danger for which Lilya had voluntarily assumed the risk? YES.

3. The Court found that Lilya had voluntarily assumed the risk of the mechanical bull based on the following findings of fact. Lilya was aware of two riders who had ridden the mechanical bull immediately before he rode it who had fallen off. Lilya noticed a thick floor mat around the mechanical bull that was there to protect riders when they fell. Lilya also signed a release before riding the mechanical bull which stated that he recognized that riding the mechanical bull involves “…known and unanticipated risks which could result in physical or emotional injury, paralysis, death, or damage to myself…” and he agreed and promised to “…accept and assume all risks existing in this activity.”

4. I think the outcome was good and I would have decided the case the same way if I were judge.

5. I think the reasons stated in #3 above are sufficient reasons for the outcome.

6. Internet Research:

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-supreme-court/1223610.html