Renaissance architect Leon Battista Alberti said that ?all things are known by comparison.
Comparison holds this power in itself, immediately showing what is more in things, what is less
or what is equal.? Centuries later, Colin Rowe?s essay ?The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa? also
used comparison to create a conceptual alignment between two buildings that had previously
been seen as ideologically and formally incompatible. Comparison as a critical tool is therefore
not merely descriptive but can be used to reveal or instigate an architectural idea that only
becomes visible as a result of looking carefully at two things, rather than one alone.
Following the lead of Alberti and Rowe, pick two buildings from the historical period of the
lectures thus far (roughly 1450-1850) and perform a close reading of similarities and
differences. The primary goal of this exercise is to look carefully at both buildings and their
drawings and/ or photographs in order to dissect them based on the visual evidence rather than
on the textual, written evidence. Pay close attention to how each building fits or does not fit the
concepts associated with the historical moment in which it is has been positioned throughout the
course (ie. Renaissance, Baroque, etc.) The close reading should also identify what are the
most salient or critical aspects of the building; in other words, what features are exemplary and
exceptional. The final part of the paper should attempt to describe the relationship between the
two buildings historically as a result of your close reading.
Details:
– Word count ~1500 words.
– Please include the necessary documentation images and drawings of both projects.
– You may include drawings, diagrams or other such graphic evidence. However, this is not
required.
Pay particular attention to issues such as:
plan
section
elevation
massing
tectonics
part/ whole
figure/ ground
regularity/ anomaly
expansion/ containment
mass/ volume
solid/ void
plan in relationship to elevation
continuous/ discontinuous
space/ structure
center/ edge
frontal/ corner
grammar/ rhetoric
tension/ compression
expansion/ contraction
three-dimensional/ flat
figure/ afigural
layering/ stacking
symmetry/ asymmetry
local/ totalizing
micro/ macro
rhythmic/ syncopated
centrality/ edge stress
free plan/ open plan
deep space/ shallow space
public/ private
served/ servant
poche/ no poche
facade/ elevation
fragment/ whole
pure/ specific
congruent/ incongruent
additive/ subtractive
subject/ object
Previous answers to this question
This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.
Get The Answer History of Architecture and Urbanism II;Alex Maymind/ ?Fondle the Details?
Renaissance architect Leon Battista Alberti said that ?all things are known by comparison.
Comparison holds this power in itself, immediately showing what is more in things, what is less
or what is equal.? Centuries later, Colin Rowe?s essay ?The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa? also
used comparison to create a conceptual alignment between two buildings that had previously
been seen as ideologically and formally incompatible. Comparison as a critical tool is therefore
not merely descriptive but can be used to reveal or instigate an architectural idea that only
becomes visible as a result of looking carefully at two things, rather than one alone.
Following the lead of Alberti and Rowe, pick two buildings from the historical period of the
lectures thus far (roughly 1450-1850) and perform a close reading of similarities and
differences. The primary goal of this exercise is to look carefully at both buildings and their
drawings and/ or photographs in order to dissect them based on the visual evidence rather than
on the textual, written evidence. Pay close attention to how each building fits or does not fit the
concepts associated with the historical moment in which it is has been positioned throughout the
course (ie. Renaissance, Baroque, etc.) The close reading should also identify what are the
most salient or critical aspects of the building; in other words, what features are exemplary and
exceptional. The final part of the paper should attempt to describe the relationship between the
two buildings historically as a result of your close reading.
Details:
– Word count ~1500 words.
– Please include the necessary documentation images and drawings of both projects.
– You may include drawings, diagrams or other such graphic evidence. However, this is not
required.
Pay particular attention to issues such as:
plan
section
elevation
massing
tectonics
part/ whole
figure/ ground
regularity/ anomaly
expansion/ containment
mass/ volume
solid/ void
plan in relationship to elevation
continuous/ discontinuous
space/ structure
center/ edge
frontal/ corner
grammar/ rhetoric
tension/ compression
expansion/ contraction
three-dimensional/ flat
figure/ afigural
layering/ stacking
symmetry/ asymmetry
local/ totalizing
micro/ macro
rhythmic/ syncopated
centrality/ edge stress
free plan/ open plan
deep space/ shallow space
public/ private
served/ servant
poche/ no poche
facade/ elevation
fragment/ whole
pure/ specific
congruent/ incongruent
additive/ subtractive
subject/ object
Previous answers to this question
This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.
Get The Answer