Skip to content
  • +254-729-010-973
  • support@benedictsol.com

Notice: Get Professional Academic Writing

Quick Links
  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us

Homework Help

Premier write my essay and Homework help service

  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us

Professional Counseling

February 20, 2018August 12, 2017 admin
‘
‘
March 20, 2017

<'">
0

0

Services

Professional Counseling

Professional CounselingWeek 3 Assessment Review and Critique
Counselors have multiple tools to use with clients during career exploration. Assessments are one of the tools that a counselor can use to help clients explore their own beliefs, interests, values, and skills related to career development. Many of these assessments are based in career development theory. Counselors are responsible for understanding the assessments they choose to use with clients. Proper evaluation and critique of an assessment prior to administering the assessment to clients is imperative. In this assignment you have the opportunity to review a written critique of a commonly used career assessment, one that you might use as a professional counselor. You will be asked to summarize potential information gained from the assessment, use with the population you hope to work with, strengths and weaknesses of the assessment to include the psychometric properties of the assessment, and any cultural considerations when using the assessment.
Use the APA Publication Guide (6th ed) template to format your document, which is located in each module.
Directions
Read your textbook chapters to prepare for this assignment. Once you have reviewed all of the course resources, select one of the assessment critiques below (provided in Blackboard in the Resources section) to read, review, and use for this assignment.
Boggs, K. R. (1999). Campbell interested and skill survey: Review and critique. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 168-181.
Case, J.C. & Blackwell, T. L. (2008). Test review. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 122-126.
Luzzo, D.A. (1996). A psychometric evaluation of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 276-279.

Address in paragraph form:
A summary of the potential information assessed and gained from the assessment (2 paragraphs).
Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the assessment including discussion of psychometrics of the assessment (2 paragraphs)
Reflect on how this assessment could be used with your preferred client population and any cultural considerations when administering the assessment. Consider all of your course resources and the article selected. (1-2 paragraphs).
Submit your assignment written in APA sixth edition style guidelines in one Word document to Blackboard on or before Day 7 at 11:59pm (CST).
Rubric for Grading
Category 50 Total Points
13 -15 points 9 – 12 points 5-8 points 0-4 points
Summary of the information assessed and gained from the assessment Information clearly relates to the category/prompt. It includes 2-3 supporting details and/or examples Provided a thorough summary. Demonstrated partially accurate understanding of the concepts
Provided a summary. Demonstrated some difficulty in understanding the concepts Summary is completely inaccurate or missing
Discussed strengths and weaknesses Information clearly relates to the strengths and weaknesses of the article. It includes 2-3 supporting details and/or examples.
Psychometric properties including reliability and validity were addressed. Information relates to the strengths and weaknesses of the article. It includes few supporting details and/or examples.
Discusses psychometrics but does not show evidence of understanding concepts. Information does not address several supporting details and/or examples Information is disorganized or missing content
9-10 points 7-8 points 5-6 points 0-4 points
Reflect on use of assessment with preferred population and cultural considerations Discusses the use of the assessment with a specific population. 2-3 examples provided along. Discusses cultural considerations when using the assessment. Discusses use with specific population with 1-2 examples. Cultural considerations discussed. Discussion of use with population and cultural considerations minimal, general, or vague. Discussion is minimal, non-specific, or missing
Mechanics
Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format. All sources are accurately documented in APA format and writing contains no grammatical errors Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format with few errors. Most sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in APA format and writing contains few grammatical errors Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format with few errors. Some sources are not accurately documented and writing contains numerous grammatical errors Numerous sources are not documented accurately and there is not a format used

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Previous answers to this question


This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.

order uk best essays Get The Answer
Uncategorized

Post navigation

Week 1 Assignment Legal Underpinnings of Business Law
Unit 6: Research Project /Research Specification/Proposal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Professional Counseling

February 20, 2018August 12, 2017 admin
‘
‘
March 20, 2017

<'">
0

0

Services

Professional Counseling

Professional CounselingWeek 3 Assessment Review and Critique
Counselors have multiple tools to use with clients during career exploration. Assessments are one of the tools that a counselor can use to help clients explore their own beliefs, interests, values, and skills related to career development. Many of these assessments are based in career development theory. Counselors are responsible for understanding the assessments they choose to use with clients. Proper evaluation and critique of an assessment prior to administering the assessment to clients is imperative. In this assignment you have the opportunity to review a written critique of a commonly used career assessment, one that you might use as a professional counselor. You will be asked to summarize potential information gained from the assessment, use with the population you hope to work with, strengths and weaknesses of the assessment to include the psychometric properties of the assessment, and any cultural considerations when using the assessment.
Use the APA Publication Guide (6th ed) template to format your document, which is located in each module.
Directions
Read your textbook chapters to prepare for this assignment. Once you have reviewed all of the course resources, select one of the assessment critiques below (provided in Blackboard in the Resources section) to read, review, and use for this assignment.
Boggs, K. R. (1999). Campbell interested and skill survey: Review and critique. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 168-181.
Case, J.C. & Blackwell, T. L. (2008). Test review. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(2), 122-126.
Luzzo, D.A. (1996). A psychometric evaluation of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 276-279.

Address in paragraph form:
A summary of the potential information assessed and gained from the assessment (2 paragraphs).
Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the assessment including discussion of psychometrics of the assessment (2 paragraphs)
Reflect on how this assessment could be used with your preferred client population and any cultural considerations when administering the assessment. Consider all of your course resources and the article selected. (1-2 paragraphs).
Submit your assignment written in APA sixth edition style guidelines in one Word document to Blackboard on or before Day 7 at 11:59pm (CST).
Rubric for Grading
Category 50 Total Points
13 -15 points 9 – 12 points 5-8 points 0-4 points
Summary of the information assessed and gained from the assessment Information clearly relates to the category/prompt. It includes 2-3 supporting details and/or examples Provided a thorough summary. Demonstrated partially accurate understanding of the concepts
Provided a summary. Demonstrated some difficulty in understanding the concepts Summary is completely inaccurate or missing
Discussed strengths and weaknesses Information clearly relates to the strengths and weaknesses of the article. It includes 2-3 supporting details and/or examples.
Psychometric properties including reliability and validity were addressed. Information relates to the strengths and weaknesses of the article. It includes few supporting details and/or examples.
Discusses psychometrics but does not show evidence of understanding concepts. Information does not address several supporting details and/or examples Information is disorganized or missing content
9-10 points 7-8 points 5-6 points 0-4 points
Reflect on use of assessment with preferred population and cultural considerations Discusses the use of the assessment with a specific population. 2-3 examples provided along. Discusses cultural considerations when using the assessment. Discusses use with specific population with 1-2 examples. Cultural considerations discussed. Discussion of use with population and cultural considerations minimal, general, or vague. Discussion is minimal, non-specific, or missing
Mechanics
Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format. All sources are accurately documented in APA format and writing contains no grammatical errors Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format with few errors. Most sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in APA format and writing contains few grammatical errors Writing adheres to APA sixth edition format with few errors. Some sources are not accurately documented and writing contains numerous grammatical errors Numerous sources are not documented accurately and there is not a format used

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Previous answers to this question


This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.

order uk best essays Get The Answer
Uncategorized

Post navigation

Week 1 Assignment Legal Underpinnings of Business Law
Unit 6: Research Project /Research Specification/Proposal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Guarantees

  • 100% High Quality Writing
  • 100% Custom papers
  • 100% Privacy
  • 100% Money Back
  • On-time Delivery
  • Customer-friendly Support

Recent Posts

  • Topic: Sustainable solutions to address management for refugee resettlement in the United States of America: The case of refugee resettlement in San Diego, California
  • Written Assignment 8 – Ethics Paper Length: 2-4 pages (not including title page and references page) Due: By midnight (PT) on the 7th day of Week 10, Mod 5
  • Week 7 – Assignment: Critique the Effectiveness of Zero Tolerance Policies
  • LO1: Gain practice writing to participate in a larger discourse
  • Topic: Peer Review 2
  • Nursing Benchmark – Drafting a Literature Review
  • essay on Biomechanics: Joints Movement
  • Nursing # Case Study 1: ( 2 pages ), Chapter 46, Management of Patients With Oral and Esophageal Disorders
  • The best spinner-article writing prompts
  • essay on Budget Process (finance).
  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us
Copyright. All rights reserved.
Proudly powered by WordPress | Education Hub by WEN Themes