Skip to content
  • +254-729-010-973
  • support@benedictsol.com

Notice: Get Professional Academic Writing

Quick Links
  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us

Homework Help

Premier write my essay and Homework help service

  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us

the human genome project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior

February 20, 2018August 12, 2017 admin
‘
‘
March 21, 2017

<'">
0

0

Services

the human genome project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior

The Human Genome Project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior, including the gene that produces MAOA. This type of genetic evidence is affecting the criminal and civil courts, as in the recent cases in Italy discussed in class where genetic evidence was used to mitigate sentences. There are multiple points at which the courts could consider genetic evidence.
Imagine a defendant charged with murder. Genetic screening shows that he has the low activity variant of the MAO-A gene and there is evidence that he was severely abused as a child, possibly increasing his propensity for violent behavior. Based on this, answer the following questions:

1. Should this genetic evidence be considered at a bail hearing? In other words, should we permit pre-trial detention based on genetic predictions of the defendant’s future behavior? Why or why not?

2. Should the defendant be permitted to present this genetic evidence as a defense at the trial, when his guilt or innocence is being determined? Why or why not?

3. Courts currently are accepting some genetic evidence at sentencing. Given this, do you think that the defendant’s genetic predisposition should be considered to be an aggravating factor or a mitigating factor? Explain your answer.

For example, if it was used as an aggravating factor, the prosecution might call for a harsher sentence, claiming that the defendant’s genetic makeup means that he is unlikely to be rehabilitated and therefore presents a high future risk to society.

If it was used as a mitigating factor, the defense might request a less severe sentence on the grounds that the defendant’s genetic makeup affects his ability to control his own actions?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Previous answers to this question


This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.

order uk best essays Get The Answer
Uncategorized

Post navigation

Hand Hygiene is the Single Most Important Remedy for Nosocomial Infections
Discuss the role and effects of span of control,

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

the human genome project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior

February 20, 2018August 12, 2017 admin
‘
‘
March 21, 2017

<'">
0

0

Services

the human genome project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior

The Human Genome Project has identified a number of genes that are linked to violent behavior, including the gene that produces MAOA. This type of genetic evidence is affecting the criminal and civil courts, as in the recent cases in Italy discussed in class where genetic evidence was used to mitigate sentences. There are multiple points at which the courts could consider genetic evidence.
Imagine a defendant charged with murder. Genetic screening shows that he has the low activity variant of the MAO-A gene and there is evidence that he was severely abused as a child, possibly increasing his propensity for violent behavior. Based on this, answer the following questions:

1. Should this genetic evidence be considered at a bail hearing? In other words, should we permit pre-trial detention based on genetic predictions of the defendant’s future behavior? Why or why not?

2. Should the defendant be permitted to present this genetic evidence as a defense at the trial, when his guilt or innocence is being determined? Why or why not?

3. Courts currently are accepting some genetic evidence at sentencing. Given this, do you think that the defendant’s genetic predisposition should be considered to be an aggravating factor or a mitigating factor? Explain your answer.

For example, if it was used as an aggravating factor, the prosecution might call for a harsher sentence, claiming that the defendant’s genetic makeup means that he is unlikely to be rehabilitated and therefore presents a high future risk to society.

If it was used as a mitigating factor, the defense might request a less severe sentence on the grounds that the defendant’s genetic makeup affects his ability to control his own actions?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Previous answers to this question


This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.

order uk best essays Get The Answer
Uncategorized

Post navigation

Hand Hygiene is the Single Most Important Remedy for Nosocomial Infections
Discuss the role and effects of span of control,

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Guarantees

  • 100% High Quality Writing
  • 100% Custom papers
  • 100% Privacy
  • 100% Money Back
  • On-time Delivery
  • Customer-friendly Support

Recent Posts

  • Topic: Sustainable solutions to address management for refugee resettlement in the United States of America: The case of refugee resettlement in San Diego, California
  • Written Assignment 8 – Ethics Paper Length: 2-4 pages (not including title page and references page) Due: By midnight (PT) on the 7th day of Week 10, Mod 5
  • Week 7 – Assignment: Critique the Effectiveness of Zero Tolerance Policies
  • LO1: Gain practice writing to participate in a larger discourse
  • Topic: Peer Review 2
  • Nursing Benchmark – Drafting a Literature Review
  • essay on Biomechanics: Joints Movement
  • Nursing # Case Study 1: ( 2 pages ), Chapter 46, Management of Patients With Oral and Esophageal Disorders
  • The best spinner-article writing prompts
  • essay on Budget Process (finance).
  • Home
  • ORDER NOW
  • Blogs
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Contact Us
Copyright. All rights reserved.
Proudly powered by WordPress | Education Hub by WEN Themes