{"id":77410,"date":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","date_gmt":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/writemyessayfree.com\/finance-questions-assignment-final-exam-2014"},"modified":"2017-08-18T07:14:07","modified_gmt":"2017-08-18T07:14:07","slug":"finance-questions-assignment-final-exam-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/finance-questions-assignment-final-exam-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Finance Questions Assignment final exam 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Final Exam Fall 2014<\/p>\n<p>1. The one-year spot rate of interest is 4%. A 2-year bond that pays a $50 (annual payments)<br \/> currently sells for $1,000.46. What is the 2-year spot rate?<\/p>\n<p>2. Todays date is November 15, 2014. Spot rates in the market right now look like this:<\/p>\n<p>1-year<\/p>\n<p>3.5%<\/p>\n<p>4-year<\/p>\n<p>4.5%<\/p>\n<p>2-year<\/p>\n<p>4.0%<\/p>\n<p>5-year<\/p>\n<p>5.0%<\/p>\n<p>3-year<\/p>\n<p>4.25%<\/p>\n<p>6-year<\/p>\n<p>5.75%<\/p>\n<p>A bond pays a 5.5% coupon rate (annual payments) and has a par value of $1,000. It matures in<br \/> six years and makes payments on November 14 each year (so the first payment is due one year<br \/> from now). Assuming the expectations hypothesis is true, what is the expected price of this bond<br \/> on November 15, 2017?<\/p>\n<p>3. Refer back to the bond in problem #2. Suppose that the expectations hypothesis is not true,<br \/> and instead there is a liquidity premium built into interest rates such that the expected return on<br \/> long-term bonds is generally higher than the expected return on a series of short-term bonds.<br \/> Given this, the price you estimated in question 2 is<\/p>\n<p>a. correct<br \/> b. too high<br \/> c. too low<\/p>\n<p>4. Which of the two bonds below would you rather buy if you think interest rates at all<br \/> maturities are about to fall (i.e, the entire yield curve is shifting down)? Explain your answer.<\/p>\n<p>A zero-coupon Treasury bond maturing in 6 years, priced to yield 5%, with a $1,000 par value.<\/p>\n<p>A Treasury bond with a $1,000 par value, paying an annual coupon rate of 6.5% (assume annual<br \/> payments), priced to yield 5%, and maturing in 7 years.<\/p>\n<p>5. You can only invest in the two stocks below, and there is no risk-free asset.<\/p>\n<p>Stock #1<\/p>\n<p>Stock #2<\/p>\n<p>Expected return<\/p>\n<p>8%<\/p>\n<p>12%<\/p>\n<p>Std. deviation<\/p>\n<p>20%<\/p>\n<p>40%<\/p>\n<p>Correlation between #1 and #2 = 0.3<\/p>\n<p>a. Calculate the expected return and standard deviation of a portfolio consisting of 90% stock #1<br \/> and 10% stock #2.<\/p>\n<p>b. The portfolio you examined in part (a) is<br \/> i. efficient<br \/> ii. inefficient<br \/> iii. impossible to say<\/p>\n<p>6. The risk-free rate is 4%. You are allowed to borrow or lend at the risk-free rate, and you can<br \/> invest in one of the following mutual funds, but only one. Which one would be part of your<br \/> portfolio (assume that you want to take at least some risk, so investing 100% of your money in<br \/> the risk-free asset is not an option).<\/p>\n<p>Expected<\/p>\n<p>Standard<\/p>\n<p>Fund<\/p>\n<p>Return<\/p>\n<p>Deviation<\/p>\n<p>1<\/p>\n<p>8%<\/p>\n<p>14%<\/p>\n<p>2<\/p>\n<p>11%<\/p>\n<p>22%<\/p>\n<p>3<\/p>\n<p>13%<\/p>\n<p>28%<\/p>\n<p>4<\/p>\n<p>17%<\/p>\n<p>43%<\/p>\n<p>7. A stock with a beta of 1.0 will almost surely have a standard deviation that is<\/p>\n<p>a. equal to the markets standard deviation<br \/> b. greater than the markets standard deviation<br \/> c. less than the markets standard deviation<\/p>\n<p>8. The risk-free rate is 0.1% per month (thats 0.001 in decimal form). The monthly expected<br \/> return and standard deviation for five different assets appear below. Calculate the Sharpe ratio<br \/> (use monthly datadont convert to annual) for each asset.<br \/> Expected<\/p>\n<p>Standard<\/p>\n<p>Return<\/p>\n<p>Deviation<\/p>\n<p>#1<\/p>\n<p>0.5%<\/p>\n<p>6.0%<\/p>\n<p>#2<\/p>\n<p>0.7%<\/p>\n<p>6.5%<\/p>\n<p>#3<\/p>\n<p>0.9%<\/p>\n<p>7.0%<\/p>\n<p>#4<\/p>\n<p>1.1%<\/p>\n<p>7.5%<\/p>\n<p>#5<\/p>\n<p>1.3%<\/p>\n<p>8.0%<\/p>\n<p>9. Open the portfolio optimizer file that I provided. This file has the data above already input,<br \/> along with the matrix of correlation coefficients between every pair of stocks.<\/p>\n<p>a. Asset #1 has the 2nd highest weight in the optimal portfolio. Is this what you would have<br \/> expected given this assets Sharpe ratio from the previous problem? If yes, why? If no, explain<br \/> why it gets a different weighting than you would have expected based solely on the Sharpe ratio.<\/p>\n<p>b. Why does Asset #4 get the heaviest weighting in the optimal portfolio?<\/p>\n<p>c. Suppose you have a friend who says that he is very tolerant of risk, and therefore prefers to<br \/> invest in riskier assets to earn higher returns. Your share the portfolio optimizer with your friend,<br \/> who says that he would prefer to invest in asset #5 rather than the optimal portfolio. He says,<br \/> Its true that asset #5 is riskier than the optimal portfolio, but Im willing to take the extra risk to<br \/> earn the extra return. What would your response be? How would you advise your friend? You<br \/> dont need to do any math to answer this question.<\/p>\n<p>10. In the portfolio optimizer file, there is a tab labeled telecom. On that tab, column B lists<br \/> monthly returns on the S&amp;amp;P500 stock index for the past 36 months. Column C lists monthly<br \/> returns on a Fidelity mutual fund that invests exclusively in stocks in the telecommunications<\/p>\n<p>industry. I looked up the beta of this fund online (ticker is FTUIX). According to Yahoo<br \/> Finance, the beta is 0.54.<\/p>\n<p>a. Calculate the monthly standard deviation of both the fund and the S&amp;amp;P500. Which investment<br \/> has greater volatility? Is this surprising given the funds beta as reported by Yahoo? Why or<br \/> why not?<\/p>\n<p>b. Estimate a single-index model regression for the fund. This means running a regression where<br \/> the funds return is the Y variable and the markets return is the X variable. What is the funds<br \/> beta? What is its R2?<br \/> 11. Construct a gross payoff diagram for the following portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>Buy a call with X = $35, sell 2 calls with X = $40, buy a call with X = $45.<\/p>\n<p>In this portfolio, you are spending money to buy two options, but you are receiving money from<br \/> two options that you are selling. Based solely on a no arbitrage argument, which is greater, the<br \/> cost of the options you are buying or the revenue of the options you are selling? Another way to<br \/> frame this question is thiswhen you construct this portfolio, do you have to pay money up<br \/> front or do you receive money up front? You do not need to attempt to calculate option prices to<br \/> answer this question, and in fact, if you base your answer on a numerical example that you<br \/> create, that answer will be insufficient because one numerical example cannot prove the general<br \/> point here.<\/p>\n<p>12. The price of a stock today is $71. In three months, the stock may go up to $80, or it may fall<br \/> to $64. Lets assume that you believe these outcomes are equally likely. The risk-free rate is 2%<br \/> per year.<\/p>\n<p>a. What is the arbitrage-free price of a put option that expires in three months and has a strike<br \/> price of $75?<\/p>\n<p>b. Suppose all of the facts are the same as in part (a), except that you now believe that the<br \/> probability that the stock will go up is 60%, and the probability that it will go down is 40%.<br \/> Does this change the arbitrage-free price of the put option? Why or why not? There is no need to<br \/> do any math to answer this question.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Final Exam Fall 2014 1. The one-year spot rate of interest is 4%. A 2-year bond that pays a $50 (annual payments) currently sells for $1,000.46. What is the 2-year spot rate? 2. Todays date is November 15, 2014. Spot <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/finance-questions-assignment-final-exam-2014\/\" class=\"read-more\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77410\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}