Healthcare marketing and program design<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Proficient<\/p>\n
Needs Improvement<\/p>\n
Not Evident<\/p>\n
Introduction <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, but response is cursory, ambiguous, or lacking necessary detail<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not identify and describe the institution where the new program would be implemented<\/p>\n
Needs Assessment: Potential <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess the organizational design for potential program development<\/p>\n
Needs Assessment: Disparities<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess community needs in terms of healthcare disparities<\/p>\n
Needs Assessment: Cultural Competence <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the organization\u2019s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the organization\u2019s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess the organization\u2019s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit<\/p>\n
Needs Assessment: Strategy <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Recommends an appropriate and logical programmatic strategy, based on results of assessments<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Recommends a programmatic strategy, but strategy is inappropriate or illogical or is not based on results of assessments<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not recommend a programmatic strategy<\/p>\n
Needs Assessment: Alignment <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Logically assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines, but assessment is cursory, vague, or illogical<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines<\/p>\n
Outcomes: Anticipated Outcomes<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization, but response is cursory or vague<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not articulate the anticipated end result and does not explain how the program will produce results for the organization<\/p>\n
Outcomes: Fit <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization, but response is cursory, vague, or illogical<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not describe how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization<\/p>\n
Outcomes: Other Areas <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why, but response or reasoning is cursory, vague, or illogical<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community<\/p>\n
Outcomes: Standards <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
6.75 (9%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
4.73 (6.3%)<\/p>\n
Assesses the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Does not assess the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards<\/p>\n
Articulation of Response (APA Style and Mechanics) <\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
7.5 (10%)<\/p>\n
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
5.25 (7%)<\/p>\n
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas<\/p>\n
Points:<\/p>\n
0 (0%)<\/p>\n
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Healthcare marketing and program design Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Introduction Points: 6.75 (9%) Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers Points: 4.73 (6.3%) Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}