{"id":434732,"date":"2018-04-27T23:29:08","date_gmt":"2018-04-27T23:29:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/essaypaper.org\/jihad-vs-mcworld-thesis-proposal\/"},"modified":"2018-10-24T08:59:48","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T08:59:48","slug":"jihad-vs-mcworld-thesis-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/jihad-vs-mcworld-thesis-proposal\/","title":{"rendered":"Jihad vs mcworld thesis proposal"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n\t\t\t \"Order\n\t\t<\/div>\n

Jihad vs. McWorld<\/h2>\n

Benjamin Barber diligently and thoroughly examines a crucial paradox that has been noted by many: the planet is being torn apart by the vestiges of race and ideology which are reasserting themselves in areas such as Bosnia and Rwanda, while at the same time it is becoming unified by economic, technological, and ecological forces that mesmerize and homogenize: MTV, McDonald\u2019s, and movies.<\/p>\n

Barber gives this tendency toward balkanization of nation-states the name \u201cJihad,\u201d a retribalization that attacks interdependence, social cooperation, and mutuality. He names \u201cMcWorld\u201d the homogenous, global theme park being created by the mass media and mass culture fostered by worldwide communications, information, entertainment, and commerce.<\/p>\n

Ironically, both tendencies of this paradox, the simultaneous fragmentation and unification, are often at work in the same country at the same time, such as in Iran, where \u201cIranian zealots keep one ear tuned to the mullahs urging holy war and the other to Rupert Murdoch\u2019s Star television beaming in DYNASTY, DONAHUE, and THE SIMPSONS from hovering satellites.\u201d<\/p>\n

Barber focuses on the relationship between Jihad and McWorld, and suggests that the world, as it is being squeezed between these opposing forces, is moving away from conscious and collective human control and toward anarchy. Jihad is driven by parochial hatreds and aims to re-create subnational and ethnic borders from within the nation-state. McWorld universalizes markets and effectively makes borders porous from without. Both, therefore, \u201cmake war on the sovereign nation-state and thus undermine the nation-state\u2019s democratic institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n

The first section of the book covers the new world of McWorld, and the increasing hegemony of Hollywood and MTV, theme parks and teleliterature. The second details Jihad, including discussion of China, the Pacific Rim, and Islam. The third section describes the \u201cNew World Disorder\u201d and the threat to democracy, with specific discussion of Russia and East Germany, and concludes with a chapter on securing global democracy.<\/p>\n

\"Low<\/div>\n

Start your free trial with eNotes to access more than 30,000 study guides. Get help with any book.<\/h3>\n

Jihad vs. McWorld Homework Help Questions<\/h3>\n

One strength in Barber\u2019s work would be the way he helps to identify new realities in the globalized world. A weakness would be that his binary distinction could blur all the complexities within.\n<\/p>\n

  • \nPostcolonialism and Barber\u2019s Jihad vs. McWorld analysis are both very difficult concepts to understand. Reducing them to simple representations is no easy task. Postcolonialism Postcolonialism.<\/li>\n
  • \nOne of the most important questions that Barber tries to answer in Jihad vs. McWorld is what can be done to prevent the undermining of democratic institutions around the world. The world after the.<\/li>\n
  • \nI\u2019m not sure I understand this question; is there any way for you to rephrase it and give us more information? By \u201cMcWorld,\u201d do you mean the kind of commercialized, consumer-oriented society.<\/li>\n
  • \n

    Benjamin Barber\u2019s 1992 article, later expanded to a book, could be argued to have been well-ahead of its time, although he was not alone in positing the problems that could emerge in a post-Cold.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    \"Jihad<\/div>\n
    \"Jihad<\/div>\n

    Popular Topics<\/h3>\n