{"id":432314,"date":"2018-10-03T21:36:45","date_gmt":"2018-10-03T21:36:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/essaypaper.org\/demonstrate-your-understanding-of-basic-statistical-tests-and-how-to-choose-the-appropriate-test-for-the-study-being-performed\/"},"modified":"2018-10-24T08:38:38","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T08:38:38","slug":"demonstrate-your-understanding-of-basic-statistical-tests-and-how-to-choose-the-appropriate-test-for-the-study-being-performed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/demonstrate-your-understanding-of-basic-statistical-tests-and-how-to-choose-the-appropriate-test-for-the-study-being-performed\/","title":{"rendered":"demonstrate your understanding of basic statistical tests and how to choose the appropriate test for the study being performed"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%<\/th>\n2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%<\/th>\n3
Satisfactory
79.00%<\/th>\n4
Good
97.00%<\/th>\n5
Excellent
100.00%<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n\n70.0 %<\/strong>Content<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Comparison Table: Table Compares Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method Articles<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA comparison table is not included.<\/td>\nA comparison table is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA comparison table is included but lacks details.<\/td>\nA comparison is complete and includes sufficient detail.<\/td>\nA comparison is complete. The comparison is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Types of Study<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA statement of the types of studies used in each article is not included.<\/td>\nA statement of the types of studies used in each article is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA statement of the types of studies used in each article is included but lacks detail.<\/td>\nA statement of the types of studies used in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.<\/td>\nA statement of the types of studies used in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Statistical Tests<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is not included.<\/td>\nA discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is included but lacks detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Parametric vs. Nonparametric Tests<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is not included.<\/td>\nA discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is included but lacks detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is complete and includes sufficient detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is clearly present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Applicability of Statistical Tests<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is not included.<\/td>\nA discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is included but lacks detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.<\/td>\nA discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Evaluation of Reliability and Validity Factors<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nAn evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is not included.<\/td>\nAn evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nAn evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is included but lacks supporting details.<\/td>\nAn evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is complete and includes supporting details<\/td>\nAn evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Summary<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nA summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is not included.<\/td>\nA summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is incomplete or incorrect.<\/td>\nA summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is included but lacks supporting details.<\/td>\nA summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is complete and includes supporting details<\/td>\nA summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n20.0 %<\/strong>Organization and Effectiveness<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n7.0 %<\/strong>Thesis Development and Purpose<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/td>\nThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/td>\nThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose<\/td>\nThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/td>\nThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n20.0 %<\/strong>Organization and Effectiveness<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n8.0 %<\/strong>Argument Logic and Construction<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/td>\nSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/td>\nArgument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/td>\nArgument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/td>\nClear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n20.0 %<\/strong>Organization and Effectiveness<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n5.0 %<\/strong>Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.<\/td>\nFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/td>\nSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the r
\neader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/td>\nProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.<\/td>\nWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n10.0 %<\/strong>Format<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n5.0 %<\/strong>Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nTemplate is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/td>\nAppropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/td>\nAppropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/td>\nAppropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/td>\nAll format elements are correct.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n5.0 %<\/strong>Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nSources are not documented.<\/td>\nDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/td>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/td>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/td>\nSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less than Satisfactory74.00% 3Satisfactory79.00% 4Good97.00% 5Excellent100.00% 70.0 %Content 10.0 %Comparison Table: Table Compares Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method Articles A comparison table is not included. A comparison table is incomplete or incorrect. A comparison table is included but lacks Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,16,145,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-432314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academic-papers","category-academic-writing","category-academic-writing-service","category-academy-management-assignment-help"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=432314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432314\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=432314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=432314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=432314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}