Policymaker Electronic Presentation\tGuidelines and Grading Rubric\tPurpose\tThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).\tCourse Outcomes\tThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:\t(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)\t(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)\t(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)\tDue Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7\tTotal Points:275 points\tRequirements\tAssignment Criteria for Presentation\t1. Describe your visit\/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.\t2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message\/ask\/recommendation(s).\t3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.\t4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.\t5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.\t6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.\tPreparing the Presentation\tAfter completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.\tCategory Points % Description\tVisit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit\/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)\tPolicymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message\/ask\/recommendation(s).\tReflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.\tFuture Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting\/presentation and their importance to nursing.\tConclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.\tAPA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.\tPresentation\/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words\/graphics, and color is effective.\tTotal 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.\tGrading Rubric\tAssignment Criteria Exceptional\t(100%)\tOutstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds\t(88%)\tVery good or high level of performance Meets\t(80%)\tCompetent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement\t(38%)\tPoor or failing level of performance Developing\t(0)\tUnsatisfactory level of performance\tContent\tPossible Points = 245 Points\tVisit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points\tClearly describes the policymaking visit\/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit\/presentation has rare inaccuracy.\tDescription of visit\/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.\tDescription of visit\/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..\tPolicymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points\tSlides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message\/ask\/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.\tSlides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.\tSlides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.\tSlides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.\tSlides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.\tReflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points\tReflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.\tReflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.\tOccasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.\tReflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.\tThere is no reflection on process.\tFuture Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points\tClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.\tDescribes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.\tClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.\tMinimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.\tDoes not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.\tConclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 Points\tConcluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.\tConcluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details\/clarity.\tConcluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.\tConcluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.\tNo conclusion.\tContent Subtotal _____of 245 points\tFormat\tPossible Points = 30 Points\tAPA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points\tSlides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.\tThere are 2-3 APA format errors.\tThere are 4-6 APA format errors.\tThere are 6-7 APA format errors.\tEight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and\/or citations are missing\tPresentation\/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points\tSlide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words\/graphics, and color is effective.\tPresentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.\tPresentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.\tMost presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.\tPresentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.\tFormat Subtotal _____of 30 points\tTotal Points _____of 275 points<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Policymaker Electronic Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}