NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice\t\u00a0\t\u00a0\tAnalysis and Application of Clinical\tPractice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric\tPurpose\tThe purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based on practice summaries. The most common type of practice summary in healthcare is the clinical practice guideline (CPG).\tCourse Outcomes\tThrough this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to\t(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9); and\t(CO 6) Utilize the principles of evidence-based practice to propose strategies that can address nursing issues (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).\tDue Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7\tTotal Points Possible:200 Points\tRequirements:\tThrough this assignment, the student will\tDevelop summary of a clinical practice guideline. (COs 3, 6)\tPreparing the paper\tYou will develop a summary that you could use within an evidence-basedpractice (EBP) committee or related venue to share with your colleagues. This paper will be 2-4 pages in length.\tSelect a clinical practice guidelines that addresses an issue pertinent to your practice setting.\tSearch the literature and evidence-based practice websites and databases to find a recent clinical practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related to the issue you select. The course Webliography provides websites where you can find clinical practice guidelines, but there are many others available in specialty-organization websites.\tAnalyze and critique the clinical practice guideline. Use the Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Template in Course Resources to develop your paper. Components include:\to scope and purpose of the clinical practice guidelines;\to stakeholder involvement;\to rigor of development;\to clarity and presentation\to applicability\to editorial independence\tAttach URL address of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the reference page of your paper.\tNote: Thetemplateisan outline to assist you in setting up your paper so you will be sure to address those topics in your paper in addition to other information to meet the criteria for this assignment. Your paper should be in APA 6th ed format. Do not copy and paste the template into your paper.\tThe summary sheetis amended from the AGREE instrument on page 200 of Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt (2015). Your summaryshould be approximately 5″\ufffd6 pages long (Paper lengths do not include cover page or reference page(s).\tCategory Points % Description\tScope and Purpose 25 12.5 Describes the scope and purpose of the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline\tStakeholder Involvement 25 12.5 Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target population.\tRigor of Development 25 12.5 Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Include level of evidence of the studies used to develop the guideline.\tClarity & presentation (Recommendations) 25 12.5 Provides thekey recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue in the guideline.\tApplication 25 12.5 Identifies facilitators, barriers, costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document.. Identifies key monitoring and\/or auditing criteria (outcomes)\tEditorial Independence 25 12.5 Discusses conflict of interest and how competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed.\tSummary 25 12.5 Summarizes how the CPG answers the key clinical questions presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advanced practice nurse, would apply the CPG in practice.\tUses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling 10 5 No more than 2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling.\tAPA 6th Edition 10 5 No more than 2 APA 6thedition errors.\tAttach pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guidelines 5 2.5 A pdf copy of the Clinical Practice Guidelines submitted.\tTotal 200 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.\tGrading Rubric\tAssignment Criteria Exceptional\t(100%)\tOutstanding or highest level of performance\tExceeds\t(88%)\tVery good or high level of performance\tMeets\t(80%)\tCompetent or satisfactory level of performance\tNeeds Improvement\t(38%)\tPoor or failing level of performance\tDeveloping\t(0)\tUnsatisfactory level of performance\tContentPossible Points = 175 Points \tScope and Purpose 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tDescribes the scope and purpose of the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline Describes the scope and purpose of the document but has occasional missing information. Describes the scope and purpose of the document with a minimal amount of information presented. Weakly describes the scope and purpose of the document. Does not include the scope or purpose of the health question covered by the guideline. \tStakeholder Involvement 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tDescribes all of the stakeholders involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target population Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document with occasional information missing. Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document with a minimal amount of information presented. Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document OR does not identify the target population. Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document AND does not identify the target population. \tRigor of Development 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tCritiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes level of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Elaborates on rigor of development. Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Some occasional important information is missing. Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Provides a minimal amount of information. Does not critique the rigor of the development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. ORDoes not include the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Does not critique the rigor of the development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. ANDDoes not include the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. \tClarity & Presentation\t(Recommendations)\t25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tProvides theall key recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the recommendations. Provides thekey recommendations of the document.\tDiscusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Missing some occasional important information.\tProvides thekey recommendations of the document.\tDiscusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Briefly elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the recommendations.\tDoes not provide or provide thekey recommendations of the document. ORDoes not discuss different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Does not provide or provide thekey recommendations of the document. ANDDoes not discuss different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. \tApplication 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tIdentifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Some occasional important information is missing. Briefly Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Does not Identify facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. ORDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Does not Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. ANDDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). \tEditorial Independence 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tDiscusses conflict of interest of group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline. Discusses conflict of interest of group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline. Some occasional important information is missing. Briefly discusses conflict of interest of group members. Briefly discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Briefly addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline. Does not discuss conflict of interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. ORDoes not address how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline. Does not discuss conflict of interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. AND\tDoes not address how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.\tSummary 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points\tSummarizes the paper. Discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG and elaborates. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice with specific examples. Summarizes the paper. Discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice. Some occasional important information is missing. Briefly summarizes the paper. Briefly discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. Briefly discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice. Does not summarize the paper. Does not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. ORDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice. Does not summarize the paper. Does not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG.ANDDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.\tContent Subtotal____\/175 points \tFormatPossible Points = 25 Points \tUses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling 10Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points\tNo errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 5 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 6 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling \tAPA 6th edition 10Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points\tNo APA 6thedition errors 1-2 APA 6thedition errors 3-4 APA 6thedition errors 5 APA 6thedition errors 6 or more APA 6thedition errorsORTurnitin similarity percentage on student written work is higher than 24%. \tAttach pdf copy of the Clinical Practice Guideline 5 Points 0 Points \tPdf file of the Clinical Practice Guideline attached No pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guideline attached \tFormat Subtotal____\/25 points \tTotal Points_____\/200 points<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice \u00a0 \u00a0 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based on Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230042","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230042"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230042\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230042"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}