{"id":209336,"date":"2018-09-14T10:48:09","date_gmt":"2018-09-14T10:48:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/index.php\/2018\/09\/14\/crj-514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-u-s-supreme-court\/"},"modified":"2018-10-24T08:53:12","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T08:53:12","slug":"crj-514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-u-s-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/crj-514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-u-s-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 1 Modern Composition of U.S. Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 1 Modern Composition of U.S. Supreme Court\t\u00a0\tExplore the ideological tendencies of the majority and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court. What is meant by liberal or conservative judges? Considering the process for selecting Supreme Court justices, is it possible for politics to not play a role in the process? Explain how these ideological\/political tendencies shape U.S. Supreme Court opinions. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.\t\u00a0\tGuided Response:\tThe vast majority of legal scholars who review Supreme Court cases agree on the political leanings of varying U.S. Supreme Court eras. Explain the consensus of the current Supreme Court, and evaluate how that political leaning will shape pending U.S. Supreme Court issues. Review your colleagues posts, and substantively respond to at least two of your peers. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on Day 7 of the week, and respond with robust dialogue to anyone who replies to your initial post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 1 Modern Composition of U.S. Supreme Court \u00a0 Explore the ideological tendencies of the majority and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court. What is meant by liberal or conservative judges? Considering the process for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/crj-514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-u-s-supreme-court\/\" class=\"read-more\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209336\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}