{"id":201776,"date":"2018-09-13T22:45:37","date_gmt":"2018-09-13T22:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/index.php\/2018\/09\/13\/adm-634-week-5-public-participation-and-mccutcheon\/"},"modified":"2018-10-24T08:49:02","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T08:49:02","slug":"adm-634-week-5-public-participation-and-mccutcheon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/adm-634-week-5-public-participation-and-mccutcheon\/","title":{"rendered":"ADM 634 Week 5 Public Participation and McCutcheon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Details:\t\u00a0\tReview the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.\t\u00a0\tIn a 750-1,000 word essay, address the following:\t\u00a0\tReview and summarize the history of the McCutcheon case.\t\u00a0\tSummarize majority and minority opinion of the case. Which argument appears more legitimate? Why?\t\u00a0\tDiscuss whether the McCutcheon decision either enhances or detracts from the public&#8217;s ability to interact meaningfully in the analysis stage of public policy. Defend your rationale.\t\u00a0\tUtilize the GCU library and\/or the Topic materials to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources to support your essay.\t\u00a0\tPrepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.\t\u00a0\tThis assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.\t\u00a0\tYou are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Details: \u00a0 Review the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission. \u00a0 In a 750-1,000 word essay, address the following: \u00a0 Review and summarize the history of the McCutcheon case. \u00a0 Summarize majority and minority opinion of the case. Which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/adm-634-week-5-public-participation-and-mccutcheon\/\" class=\"read-more\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201776"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201776\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}