Oil and Gas Management Project
\nLearning outcomes to be examined in this assessment (please note that this is NOT the assessment task) \u2022 Provide a detailed analysis of the policies designed to achieve stated corporate objectives of one or more organisation in the oil and gas industry, and an examination of the problems related to resource acquisition and deployment relevant to those policies.
\n\u2022 Provide a relevant literature review on the problems investigated and relate current management theory to practical recommendations.
\n\u2022 Demonstrate a lucid and logic discourse containing objectives of the project, methodology, relevant literature review, recommendations for action, appropriate references and bibliography.
\n\u2022 Demonstrate the elements of autonomy, personal responsibility and critical analysis and evaluation
\n\u2022 Break down a project proposal into component parts and construct a time and cost constrained project plan towards its completion
\n\u2022 Reflecting on Personal Development Planning
\nPercentage of marks awarded for module: This assignment is worth 100% of the total marks for the module<\/p>\n
Assessment criteria Explanatory comments on the assessment criteria Maximum marks for each section
\nAims of research Clearly defined objectives\/research questions relevant to aim. Clear focus on aims \/ objectives maintained throughout. If appropriate, hypotheses defined and explained. 10%
\nLiterature review Thorough review of appropriate secondary sources; relationship between the literature and the project explored (i.e. justification is linked to literature) (20%)
\nResearch methodology Explanation and justification of an appropriate methodology \u2013 approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions. (20%)
\nData Analysis Appropriate analysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Clear and analytical presentation of findings. (10%)
\nDiscussion – Results discussed, highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice where appropriate (10%)
\nConclusions \/ recommendations Based on a reasonable interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature. (10%)
\nCritical evaluation Critical evaluation of own work. Areas for further research identified and discussed. (5%)
\nOverall layout and Presentation is of an acceptable standard, logical and adds value to the document. Appropriate structure. (5%)
\nReflection Reflection on programme is detailed and insightful. (10%)
\nBackground
\nN\/A<\/p>\n
Assignment Task
\n1. Analyse one or more strategic problems in the oil and gas industries and produce a comprehensive report detailing the objectives, methodologies, findings, analysis, and conclusions of the research carried out above. The word length for the report is 10,000 words.
\n2. Analyse the extent to which you have developed your knowledge, throughout the course and how the course and this project has helped your employability. This should be summarised as a personal statement of no more than 500 words and placed in an appendix to the main document.<\/p>\n
Total Marks for Assignment: 100<\/p>\n
Indicative Content
\nAims of research
\nDefine objectives\/research questions relevant to aim. Maintain focus on aims\/objectives throughout. Define and explain hypotheses. (Worth 10% of marks)
\nLiterature review
\nConduct thorough review of appropriate secondary sources. Critically explore relationship between the literature and the project. (Worth 20% of marks)
\nResearch methodology
\nExplain and justify an appropriate methodology \u2013 approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions. (Worth 20% of marks)
\nData Analysis
\nAnalysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Analytical presentation of findings (Worth 10% of marks)
\nDiscussion
\nDiscuss results highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice
\n(Worth 10% of marks)
\nConclusions \/ recommendations
\nFormulate conclusions and recommendations based on interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature.
\n(Worth 10% of marks)
\nCritical evaluation
\nCritically evaluate work. Identify and discuss areas for further research.
\n(Worth 5% of marks)
\nPresentation
\nPresent work to an acceptable standard that is logical and adds value to the document.
\n(Worth 5% of marks)
\nReflection
\nReflect in a detailed and insightful manner.
\n(Worth 10% of marks)<\/p>\n
Marking Criteria for Assessment at Level 6 (Bachelors Degree with Honours)
\nMarks 0-25 (Fail) 26-39 (Fail) 40-49 (3rd) 50-59 (2.2) 60-69 (2.1) 70-85 (1st) 70-85 (1st)
\nAssessment categories<\/p>\n
Knowledge & Understanding of Subject Major gaps in knowledge and
\nunderstanding of
\nmaterial at this level. Substantial
\ninaccuracies. Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial
\nunderstanding.
\nSome significant inaccuracies. Threshold level.
\nUnderstanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Systematic understanding of
\nfield(s) of study, as
\nindicated by relevant QAA
\nsubject benchmark statements for the degree programme. Good understanding of the field(s) of
\nstudy; coherent
\nknowledge, in line with subject
\nbenchmark, at least in part informed by current research in
\nthe subject discipline. Excellent knowledge and understanding of
\nthe main concepts
\nand key theories\/
\nconcepts of the discipline(s). Clear
\nawareness of the
\nlimitations of the knowledge base. Highly detailed knowledge and
\nunderstanding of the
\nmain theories\/concepts of the discipline(s), and
\nan awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of
\nknowledge.<\/p>\n
Cognitive\/ Intellectual Skills<\/p>\n
(e.g. analysis and synthesis; logic and argument; analytical reflection; organisation and communication
\nof ideas and evidence) Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use
\nof any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable\/
\nmissing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse,
\nsynthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of
\nideas. Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills,
\nbut for the most part descriptive. Ideas\/findings sometimes illogical
\nand contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence.
\nConclusions lack relevance. Threshold level.
\nEvidence of some logical, analytical thinking and some attempts to synthesise, albeit with some weaknesses. Some evidence to support findings\/
\nviews, but evidence not consistently
\ninterpreted. Some relevant conclusions Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and
\nsynthesis. Can analyse new and\/or abstract data and situations without
\nguidance.
\nAn emerging awareness of different stances and ability to use
\nevidence to support the argument.
\nValid conclusions Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and
\nevaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to
\nreview the reliability, validity & significance of evidence. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence
\naccurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing
\nconclusions. Thoroughly logical work, supported by judiciously selected
\nand evaluated evidence. High quality analysis, developed independently or
\nthrough effective collaboration..
\nAbility to investigate contradictory information and
\nidentify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Exceptional work; judiciously selected and evaluated
\nevidence. Very high quality analysis, developed independently or
\nthrough effective collaboration.
\nAbility to investigate contradictory information and identify
\nreasons for contradictions.
\nHighly persuasive
\nconclusions.<\/p>\n
Use of Research- informed Literature (including referencing, appropriate academic conventions and academic honesty) Little evidence of reading.
\nViews and
\nfindings unsupported and non-authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored. Evidence of little reading and\/or of reliance on
\ninappropriate sources, and\/or indiscriminate use of sources.
\nAcademic conventions used inconsistently. Threshold level.
\nReferences to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses. Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a
\nrange of research- informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed
\nindependently. Academic skills consistently applied. Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-
\ninformed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with
\naccuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied. Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded
\nin the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level
\nacademic skills consistently applied. Outstanding knowledge of research-informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level academic skills consistently and professionally applied.
\nLEVEL 6 cont\u2026<\/p>\n
Graduate Skills for Life and Employment<\/p>\n
(e.g. research- related skills; written, graphical and oral communication skills;
\ngroup working; problem-solving; practical and professional skills) Little or no evidence of the
\nrequired skills in
\nany of the graduate skills
\nidentified in the programme specification at this level. Limited evidence of the graduate skills
\nidentified in the
\nprogramme specification.
\nSignificant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the
\ncandidate has not gained the skills necessary for graduate-level
\nemployment. Research skills:
\nCan competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses.
\nCan communicate
\nin a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses.
\nCan generally work
\neffectively within
\na team, negotiating
\nin a professional manner and managing conflict. Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems and
\napplying knowledge and methods to
\ntheir solution.
\nAble to recognise
\nown strengths and weaknesses in relation to graduate employment, with minor areas of weakness. Research skills:
\nCan competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, including orally, at
\na standard appropriate for
\ngraduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses.
\nCan consistently work effectively within a team,
\nnegotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems and
\napplying knowledge and methods to
\ntheir solution. Able to evaluate
\nown strengths and weaknesses
\nin relation to graduate employment. Research skills:
\nCan successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with very limited external guidance. Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.
\nCan consistently work very well within a team,
\nleading & negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict.
\nIs confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex
\nproblems and
\napplying knowledge and methods to their solution.
\nAble to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in
\nrelation to graduate- level professional and practical skills, and
\nact autonomously to
\ndevelop new areas of skills as necessary. Research skills:
\nCan very successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.
\nCan work
\nprofessionally within a team,
\nshowing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict and meeting obligations.
\nIs professional and flexible in autonomously identifying and
\ndefining a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution.
\nAble to show insight and autonomy in
\nevaluating own
\nstrengths and weaknesses and
\ndeveloping professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Research skills:
\nExceptionally successful in a wide range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy Can communicate with an exceptionally high level of professionalism, in a range of formats, including orally, appropriate for graduate-level employment.
\nCan work
\nexceptionally well and professionally within a team, showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict, and
\nmeeting all obligations. Is exceptionally
\nprofessional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving
\na range of complex problems and applying knowledge and
\nmethods to their
\nsolution.
\nOutstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing
\noutstanding attributes for graduate-level employment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Oil and Gas Management Project Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment (please note that this is NOT the assessment task) \u2022 Provide a detailed analysis of the policies designed to achieve stated corporate objectives of one or more Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}