{"id":182860,"date":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","date_gmt":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/writemyessayfree.com\/brand-turnaround"},"modified":"2018-10-24T09:07:37","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T09:07:37","slug":"brand-turnaround","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/brand-turnaround\/","title":{"rendered":"Brand Turnaround"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>All students wishing to proceed to their final project should meet ALL the following conditions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>All first year modules are complete and recorded as a pass or irredeemable fail.<\/li>\n<li>The student should be following regular progression and have no more than two<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>modules outstanding.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Both internships should be complete.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>The Final Project Development Workshop should be complete.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Final Projects<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All students are required to complete a Final Project appropriate to their specialisation.<\/p>\n<p>Students will be asked to develop their subject area, research question, literature review and<\/p>\n<p>methodology within the Final Project Development Workshop. A Methodology document will<\/p>\n<p>be used to assess the workshop and will be then used to develop the final report.<\/p>\n<p>Students will be appointed a tutor who will guide them through the final stages of the report.<\/p>\n<p>It is envisaged a maximum of 2 hours of contact time with the student.<\/p>\n<p>The length of the Final Project is 10 000 words \u00b1 10%, excluding appendices and supporting<\/p>\n<p>material. Final Projects which are over length will be penalised by 10 marks for up to 20%<\/p>\n<p>over the word limit. Final Projects over 20% will not be accepted.<\/p>\n<p>Copies of the Final Project must be submitted as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>bound copy of the final project<\/li>\n<li>unbound copies of the abstract<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>An electronic copy submitted on Turnitin.com as instructed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Deadline<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2016 Submissions should be submitted by <strong>\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Extensions to the deadline for submitting final project will only be granted <strong>&nbsp;in exceptional<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>circumstances<\/strong>. Extensions must be requested in writing to the Head of Governance, along<\/p>\n<p>with supporting evidence (for example: medical certificates). Extensions are limited in<\/p>\n<p>duration and students will normally be expected to submit by the next available deadline.<\/p>\n<p>Further extensions will not be granted except in very exceptional circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of late submission, students who submit their final project up to 2 weeks after the<\/p>\n<p>given deadline will have 10% of the given mark deducted. Students who do not submit within<\/p>\n<p>this timescale will be deemed to have failed and be given a mark of zero (0). The Board of<\/p>\n<p>Examiners may give such students one further opportunity to submit their dissertation for a<\/p>\n<p>maximum of a capped mark of 40. The deadline for resubmission will be set by the<\/p>\n<p>examination board.<\/p>\n<p>Students who fail their Final Project will be given only one further opportunity to submit. The<\/p>\n<p>deadline for resubmission will be set by the examination board.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Evaluation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Final Projects are double marked by two members of academic staff and an agreed mark<\/p>\n<p>which is not necessarily the arithmetic mean of the two marks, given. Where the two markers<\/p>\n<p>cannot agree on a mark, a third independent marker will also mark the work to resolve any<\/p>\n<p>difference of opinion.<\/p>\n<p>A copy of the grading sheet is attached to this document.<\/p>\n<p>Students may, at the discretion of the examiners, be required to attend a viva voce<\/p>\n<p>examination or such other tests as may be considered appropriate. Wherever possible the<\/p>\n<p>viva should be held before the end of term, but this cannot be guaranteed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources and Referencing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All ethical issues pertaining to this research project must be discussed with your tutor and<\/p>\n<p>you should seek formal approval for such matters. Please see your academic coordinator for<\/p>\n<p>pertinent forms and more detailed information.<\/p>\n<p>Students must follow the Harvard referencing system for the Final Project. Plagiarism of any<\/p>\n<p>kind will not be tolerated and you will be awarded zero if there is any evidence of plagiarism.<\/p>\n<p>Please read the regulations on Academic Misconduct available on the Portal.<\/p>\n<p>Students are reminded to use valid and peer-reviewed references to support their work.<\/p>\n<p>Websites should only be used if they represent an established source and only for facts and<\/p>\n<p>figures.&nbsp; Students should make the most of academic and practitioner books and articles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Project Structure<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The project should consist of the following chapters:<\/p>\n<p>1) Introduction<\/p>\n<p>How well does the student set the context for the research (<em>why did you choose this topic,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>how did you come about this research<\/em>), how clear are the objectives related to the context<\/p>\n<p>set, how well does the student set out the scope of the research?<\/p>\n<p>2) Literature review<\/p>\n<p>How extensive and exhaustive is the literature review? Does it have both breadth and depth?<\/p>\n<p>Has the referencing been properly done? How well does the student demonstrate learning<\/p>\n<p>from reading others\u2019 work? Does the student\u2019s work stand on the shoulders of giants whose<\/p>\n<p>work he\/she has familiarised himself\/herself with?<\/p>\n<p>Has the student been able to critically evaluate the literature rather than simply summarising<\/p>\n<p>it? Has the student been able to show how the literature reads and fits with his\/her proposed<\/p>\n<p>question and show how his\/her work will progress knowledge further?<\/p>\n<p>3) Methodology<\/p>\n<p>How were the data collected? (present a timeline of collection, issues\/challenges : how<\/p>\n<p>were challenges dealt with, outline development of data collection tools)<\/p>\n<p>How rigorous was the methodology in collecting the data (sampling, rationale for methods<\/p>\n<p>used; academic underpinning of methods used \u2013 why and similarly why were other<\/p>\n<p>methods not considered suitable)? How well did the student adapt to changes and new<\/p>\n<p>factors that arise during research?<\/p>\n<p>How are ethical considerations pertaining to the research addressed? How does the<\/p>\n<p>student understand the limitations of his\/her research?<\/p>\n<p>4) Findings &amp; Analysis<\/p>\n<p>Does the student explain the findings in an understandable manner? Does the student<\/p>\n<p>make intelligent sense of the data gathered in relation to the research questions set? Does<\/p>\n<p>the student critically evaluate the findings (quality of findings and analysis \u2013 not simply<\/p>\n<p>summarising the text)<\/p>\n<p>5) Conclusion, recommendation and discussion<\/p>\n<p>How well is the student able to connect draw conclusions from the findings and relate them to<\/p>\n<p>the research objectives? How does the student link the findings &amp; analysis and conclusion to<\/p>\n<p>the recommendation for future research?<\/p>\n<p>How well does the student interpret the findings in the light of the literature that s\/he has<\/p>\n<p>read?<\/p>\n<p>6) Flow of the dissertation, referencing<\/p>\n<p>How does the student structure and present his\/her report (ease of reading for the examiner,<\/p>\n<p>formatting, fonts used, spaces provided, tables, graphs, figures, etc., properly labelled,<\/p>\n<p>presented and placed)? Has the referencing been properly done?<\/p>\n<p>How easy is it to read and understand the dissertation?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All students wishing to proceed to their final project should meet ALL the following conditions: All first year modules are complete and recorded as a pass or irredeemable fail. The student should be following regular progression and have no more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/brand-turnaround\/\" class=\"read-more\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182860\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}