{"id":182815,"date":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","date_gmt":"2018-02-20T23:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/writemyessayfree.com\/inclusive-education-in-saudi-arabias-main-stream-schools"},"modified":"2018-10-24T09:24:01","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T09:24:01","slug":"inclusive-education-in-saudi-arabias-main-stream-schools","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/inclusive-education-in-saudi-arabias-main-stream-schools\/","title":{"rendered":"Inclusive education in Saudi Arabia\u2019s main stream schools"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Introduction:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>Clarity of description of purpose, rationale, and significance of the investigation<\/p>\n<p><strong>Body of the report:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Quality of literature research (e.g., currency, breadth &amp; scholarly nature of information sources) Capacity to analyse &amp; synthesise literature (e.g., scholarly literature, professional &amp; policy documents) Level of critical thinking and understanding about the area under investigation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusions: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Appropriate conclusions drawn about implications for policy or professional practice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Throughout:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Presentation (e.g., quality of writing; organisation of report; referencing standards)<\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>Overall structure<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Title: <\/strong>Contains key words or phrases to give a clear and concise description of the scope and nature of the investigation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract: <\/strong>Summary of report (<em>this is not an introduction<\/em>). Approx. 200 -250 words<\/p>\n<p><em>What?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Summary of report, not an introduction<\/p>\n<p><em>Why?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Abstract may be all that people read if the report is published. The abstract informs the reader about whether or not the report is of interest to them.<\/p>\n<p><em>Quality indicators:<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Accurately describes the purpose, general content for the report, key findings and conclusions.<\/p>\n<p><em>Guiding questions: <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Would someone reading the abstract understand what was reviewed and why, and the conclusions drawn as a result of the investigation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong>: Identifies the purpose, provides a rationale and overviews significance.<\/p>\n<p>Acquaints reader with the topic and purpose of the report<\/p>\n<p>Describes context in which the topic is to be explored<\/p>\n<p>Should generate the audience\u2019s interest in the topic<\/p>\n<p>Offers an overview of the ensuing argument\/content<\/p>\n<p>Constructing the initial paragraph \u2013 engaging the reader<\/p>\n<p>Suggestion to use one of these:<\/p>\n<p>Personal anecdote?<\/p>\n<p>Example \u2013 real or hypothetical<\/p>\n<p>Statistics<\/p>\n<p>Question<\/p>\n<p>Striking image\/portrait of the problem or issue<\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sections<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>4 to 6 well-ordered sections with logical flow of ideas.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4 to 6 sections (ensure balance of the sections plus each section has an introduction with topic sentence and conclusion)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Quality of literature research (e.g., currency, breadth, scholarly)<\/p>\n<p>Capacity to analyse and synthesise literature<\/p>\n<p>Level of critical thinking and understanding about the topic<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ensure readability of sections:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Provide continuity in your argument from first section to last section<\/p>\n<p>Readability (or paragraph or sentence); it can be understood in one pass<\/p>\n<p>Informative headings (and sub-headings) are important:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Be<\/strong> generous with them<\/p>\n<p><strong>Feel<\/strong> free to use verbs to make them informative<\/p>\n<p><strong>Finalise<\/strong> the headings after you have written the total report<\/p>\n<p><strong>Voice<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A shift in voice from first person to present your views (<em>I believe \u2026)<\/em> to third person to present facts (<em>The research indicates<\/em> \u2026.&nbsp; ) can help to focus the reader\u2019s attention.<\/p>\n<p>Use first person to engage the reader, but use sparingly. In conclusions.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Quality indicators<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Well organised and well balanced structure<\/p>\n<p>Generally moves from broad topics to specific ones<\/p>\n<p>Summary at the end of each section emphasising the key points<\/p>\n<p>Transition sentences provided between sections facilitate reading<\/p>\n<p>Accurate, verified citations and free of plagiarism<\/p>\n<p><strong>Common errors<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Poor overall organizational structure<\/p>\n<p>Overuse of quotes used<\/p>\n<p>Serial list of ideas from authors rather than a synthesis of ideas<\/p>\n<p>No distinction made between theoretical and empirical works or between the quality of sources (e.g., significant studies\/authors; peer-reviewed journals versus policy document media reports) using very old theoretical references must show up the way that u still use it till this period of time.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusions<\/strong>: Summary of main points and implications<\/p>\n<p>Reiterate your main points and implications<\/p>\n<p>Leave your reader with a sense that you achieved what you set out to achieve in the introduction<\/p>\n<p>Do not introduce any new information<\/p>\n<p>Answer any issues raised in the introduction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction: &nbsp;Clarity of description of purpose, rationale, and significance of the investigation Body of the report: Quality of literature research (e.g., currency, breadth &amp; scholarly nature of information sources) Capacity to analyse &amp; synthesise literature (e.g., scholarly literature, professional &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/inclusive-education-in-saudi-arabias-main-stream-schools\/\" class=\"read-more\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182815\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}