1. Submit six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.Weight: 25%–<\/p>\n
Levels of Achievement:<\/p>\n
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 22.48 (14.99%) <\/p>\n
Did not submit or incompletely submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.<\/p>\n
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 22.5 (15%) – 26.24 (17.49%) <\/p>\n
Insufficiently submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.<\/p>\n
Fair 70-79% C 26.25 (17.5%) – 29.98 (19.99%) <\/p>\n
Partially submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.<\/p>\n
Proficient 80-89% B 30 (20%) – 33.74 (22.49%) <\/p>\n
Satisfactorily submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.<\/p>\n
Exemplary 90-100% A 33.75 (22.5%) – 37.5 (25%) <\/p>\n
Thoroughly submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.<\/p>\n
Feedback:<\/p>\n
CRJ105-A3-22. Provide a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.Weight: 25%–<\/b><\/p>\n
Levels of Achievement:<\/p>\n
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 22.48 (14.99%) <\/p>\n
Did not submit or incompletely provided a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.<\/p>\n
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 22.5 (15%) – 26.24 (17.49%) <\/p>\n
Insufficiently provided a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.<\/p>\n
Fair 70-79% C 26.25 (17.5%) – 29.98 (19.99%) <\/p>\n
Partially provided a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.<\/p>\n
Proficient 80-89% B 30 (20%) – 33.74 (22.49%) <\/p>\n
Satisfactorily provided a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.<\/p>\n
Exemplary 90-100% A 33.75 (22.5%) – 37.5 (25%) <\/p>\n
Thoroughly provided a descriptive summary of at least 150 words for each reference.<\/p>\n
Feedback:<\/p>\n
CRJ105-A3-33. Evaluate the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.Weight: 25%–<\/b><\/p>\n
Levels of Achievement:<\/p>\n
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 22.48 (14.99%) <\/p>\n
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.<\/p>\n
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 22.5 (15%) – 26.24 (17.49%) <\/p>\n
Insufficiently evaluated the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.<\/p>\n
Fair 70-79% C 26.25 (17.5%) – 29.98 (19.99%) <\/p>\n
Partially evaluated the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.<\/p>\n
Proficient 80-89% B 30 (20%) – 33.74 (22.49%) <\/p>\n
Satisfactorily evaluated the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.<\/p>\n
Exemplary 90-100% A 33.75 (22.5%) – 37.5 (25%) <\/p>\n
Thoroughly evaluated the relevance and applicability of each reference to your chosen topic.<\/p>\n
Feedback:<\/p>\n
CRJ105-A3-44. Organize the references in alphabetical order.Weight: 10%–<\/b><\/p>\n
Levels of Achievement:<\/p>\n
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 8.98 (5.99%) <\/p>\n
Did not submit or incompletely organized the references in alphabetical order.<\/p>\n
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 9 (6%) – 10.48 (6.99%) <\/p>\n
Insufficiently organized the references in alphabetical order.<\/p>\n
Fair 70-79% C 10.5 (7%) – 11.98 (7.99%) <\/p>\n
Partially organized the references in alphabetical order.<\/p>\n
Proficient 80-89% B 12 (8%) – 13.48 (8.99%) <\/p>\n
Satisfactorily organized the references in alphabetical order.<\/p>\n
Exemplary 90-100% A 13.5 (9%) – 15 (10%) <\/p>\n
Thoroughly organized the references in alphabetical order.<\/p>\n
Feedback:<\/p>\n
CRJ105-A3-55. Conform to the APA formatting standards.<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
1. Submit six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly references for use in the Research Project.Weight: 25%– Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 22.48 (14.99%) Did not submit or incompletely submitted six (6) credible and evidence-based scholarly Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-172687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.benedictsol.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}